Does Nurse Preceptor Role Frequency Make a Difference in Preceptor Job Satisfaction?

This study identified nurse preceptor role frequency to newly licensed registered nurses and how it made a difference to the preceptors' job satisfaction. Statistical analysis revealed there was no difference in job satisfaction in preceptors who performed in the role one to four times than those who served five times or more, F(4, 124) = 0.261, p > .05. The study found variation in preceptor role preparation and differing registered nurse practice experience prior to performing as a preceptor.

An immersive clinical experience to create sustainable clinical learning opportunities for nurse practitioner students.

ABSTRACT: A significant increase in nurse practitioner program enrollment has resulted in a critical need for committed preceptors willing to offer clinical learning opportunities for students. Academic practice partnerships have been proposed as a strategy to address the preceptorship crisis. This project evaluated the impact of a longitudinal immersive clinical experience designed for nurse practitioner students in collaboration with two federally qualified health centers and an underserved clinic within an academic health center. The study used a pre- and postsurvey method to determine the impact of an immersive clinical experience on preceptor perceptions of benefits and rewards, support, and commitment to the role. A statistically significant increase in preceptor perception of support was noted in three areas. Participants reported increased opportunity to share information with other preceptors, improved support from nursing faculty to help identify students' performance problems, and greater clarity in faculty responsibilities related to the preceptor role. Increases in perceptions of benefits and rewards and commitment to the preceptor role did not reach statistical significance. Immersive clinical experiences have the potential to improve the levels of preceptor support, commitment, and perceived opportunities for benefits and rewards, which may facilitate the development of high-quality, sustainable clinical learning opportunities for nurse practitioner students.

Using Learning Style Assessments to Effectively Match Preceptors and Orientees.

Ineffective pairings between preceptors and orientees can lead to decreased job satisfaction and burnout. This article describes the results of a study using a learning style assessment tool to pair preceptors and orientees in an intensive care unit for newly hired registered nurses between February 2017 and December 2019 (n = 173).

Predictors and Motivation of Preceptors' Interest in Precepting of Pharmacy Interns-Do We Have a Useful Questionnaire?

PURPOSE: To determine the potential value of an adapted questionnaire to discover the predictors of preceptors' higher interest in precepting pharmacy interns and to evaluate preceptors' motivational factors and incentives for teaching as well as their professional satisfaction. METHOD: A link to the survey study of adapted questionnaire (JSAMPPP) was e-mailed to all pharmacists registered with the Pharmaceutical Chamber of the Republic of Srpska. Pharmacists' demographic and work experience characteristics, their attitudes related to motivation for precepting, value of incentives for precepting, job satisfaction, and influence of interns on pharmacists' professional practice were obtained. RESULTS: Half of the preceptors who reported feeling satisfied with their professional life also showed interest in teaching. In addition, teaching pharmacy students positively contributed to the overall job satisfaction of the preceptors. Pharmacy preceptors were found to be most motivated by intrinsic factors. The most valued incentives reported were those related to continuing education. CONCLUSIONS: The adapted questionnaire has potential value and it revealed the following predictors of preceptors' higher interest in precepting: enjoyment of teaching, satisfaction with professional life, satisfaction as a pharmacy preceptor, and interns' influence on preceptors. These identified predictors can be emphasized to improve pharmacy students' internship experiences, thereby reinforcing the pharmacy profession.

Addressing challenges to precepting advanced pharmacy practice experience students in the community setting.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in a community pharmacy setting is required in all accredited doctor of pharmacy program curricula in the United States. This setting often presents unique challenges to precepting students that may hinder the development and availability of robust learning experiences. This qualitative review discusses perceived challenges and potential solutions to maintaining a meaningful community rotation experience for students based on published literature and reported preceptor experiences. It also explores the clinical impact of APPE students in community pharmacy. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: St. Louis College of Pharmacy (STLCOP) provides a systematic approach to student orientation and evaluation for community pharmacy APPEs. This allows all pharmacy students to be held to the same educational outcome standard. Site preceptors are responsible for communicating site-specific expectations and providing frequent formative feedback to students throughout the five-week rotation. FINDINGS: Community rotation students spent approximately 6400 hours providing almost 30,000 patient interventions over two years, indicating a potential benefit in quality of care at student-hosted sites. Despite evidenced benefits of the presence of pharmacy students in community pharmacies, some pharmacists hesitate to precept students due to anticipated obstacles of this additional responsibility. SUMMARY: This review explored the community practice APPE structure offered at STLCOP and describes the patient impact that students have made during this clinical rotation. Data seem to indicate a positive return on investment for having APPE students in community pharmacy.

Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting.

INTRODUCTION: One-minute preceptor (OMP) and SNAPPS (a mnemonic for Summarize history and findings; Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe the preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; and Select case-related issues for self-study) are educational techniques developed to promote learners' expression of clinical reasoning during the case presentation in the workplace. The aim of this present study was to compare the content of the case presentation between the SNAPPS and the OMP methods. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial comparing SNAPPS and OMP in 60 medical students at the beginning of their fifth year of medical school. After an introduction session, students presented and discussed two cases based on real patients and provided in written format. All case presentations were recorded and evaluated by two researchers. The assessed elements of the case presentations were divided into three subgroups related to expression of clinical reasoning, time and initiative to guide the presentation. RESULTS: There were 30 participants in each group. There was no difference in the expression of clinical reasoning between OMP and SNAPPS groups (number of differential diagnoses, justification of most likely diagnosis and differential diagnosis, expression of comparing and contrasting hypotheses). However, students in the SNAPPS group expressed significantly more questions and uncertainties (p < 0.001), and more often took the initiative to present and justify the most likely diagnosis, differential diagnosis and management plan than students in the OMP group, both in simple and complex cases (all p values <0.001) without extending the length of the teaching session. CONCLUSION: OMP and SNAPPS equally promote medical students' expression of clinical reasoning. The SNAPPS technique was more effective than the OMP technique in helping students to take on an active role during case presentation. We propose SNAPPS as an effective learning tool, engaging students and promoting the expression of their clinical reasoning as part of a case presentation.

Medical Students' Exposure to Ethics Conflicts in Clinical Training: Implications for Timing UME Bioethics Education.

While there is significant consensus that undergraduate medical education (UME) should include bioethics training, there is widespread debate about how to teach bioethics to medical students. Educators disagree about course methods and approaches, the topics that should be covered, and the effectiveness and metrics for UME ethics training. One issue that has received scant attention is the timing of bioethics education during medical training. The existing literature suggests that most medical ethics education occurs in the pre-clinical years. Follow-up studies indicate that medical students in their clinical rotations have little recall or ability to apply ethics concepts that were learned in their pre-clinical training. Trainees also report a desire for medical ethics to be taught in the context of practical application, which would suggest that the timing of pre-clinical ethics education is flawed. However, moving bioethics training to the clinical years should not be assumed to be the solution to the problems of recall and theory application. We argue that the effectiveness of timing bioethics education will depend on when medical students witness or experience particular categories of ethical dilemmas during their training. Our overarching hypothesis is that ethics education will be most effective when the bioethics training on a particular topic correlates to experiential exposure to that ethical issue. The purpose of our current study was to describe medical students exposure to particular categories of ethical conflicts, dilemmas, or issues. Our results may help bioethics educators better strategize about the most effective timing of medical ethics training in UME.

Nursing Leadership Implications for Clinical Placements in Corrections.

Clinical placements in correctional settings offer nursing students unique opportunities for learning mental health and community health concepts, including social justice, restorative justice and the impact of poverty and marginalization on health and life choices. Although there is some evidence to suggest that a small number of nursing programs use clinical placements in correctional settings, relatively little scholarly literature addresses nursing education in such settings, or the implications for nursing leadership when students do have an opportunity to learn in correctional settings. In this paper, we examine the literature that is available on this topic and present the findings of a secondary analysis of interviews with undergraduate nursing students at our nursing program in relation to their clinical placements in correctional settings. Drawing on the students' perspectives, we have found that these placements, in particular, have fostered learning about caring for marginalized populations; themes of hope and restorative justice featured prominently in their descriptions of their learning. Students also emphasized that they learned a great deal about the expanded role of nurses and about caring for marginalized populations. With strong administrative and faculty support, these settings offer students exposure to expert registered nurse mentors who work with clients in an expanded role to facilitate their achievement and stabilization of a broad range of health challenges. They are also role models for students, by showing students that nurses can be agents of hope when working with a diverse client population and their families. We offer recommendations on how to maximize student learning in correctional settings, including a reflection on how to support students' integration of their learning experiences in their nursing practice, with the long-term view that these transformative student experiences have the potential to shape our future nurse leaders.

Should we use preceptorships in undergraduate nursing education?

BACKGROUND: Clinical learning experiences are the cornerstone of undergraduate nursing education as they allow students to apply theory to practice and help them develop as competent practitioners who are prepared for the realities of diverse, complex, and ever-changing practice environments. PROBLEM: The traditional clinical teaching model, where small groups of students work with educators who are on-site facilitating learning, has numerous issues and thus there have been calls for reform. This Creative Controversy focuses on one reform option, the alternative clinical teaching model of preceptorships, which has gained popularity in recent years. APPROACH: Current evidence surrounding preceptorships in undergraduate education was examined and critiqued. CONCLUSION: Despite their popularity, there is a lack of robust evidence surrounding preceptorships and the motivations for using this model remain questionable. Future study is needed so preceptorships are implemented according to evidence-based teaching practices and not clouded by inappropriate motivations. The author challenges readers to question their practices and work to positively contribute to the science and practice of nursing education.

Identifying future pharmacists: Development and implementation of a pharmacy camp experience.

INTRODUCTION: Hands-on learning continues to serve as a positive mechanism for gaining interest and increasing recruitment in the health professions. This paper explores the Harrison School of Pharmacy's (HSOP) development and implementation of a week-long pharmacy camp designed to engage learners through active learning experiences to provide early exposure to the pharmacy profession. METHODS: The planning committee was formed in fall 2016, with the inaugural camp occurring summer 2017. A partnership with Auburn University Youth Programs allowed the committee to utilize existing university infrastructure and resources. Designed to expose campers to a variety of practice settings, the curriculum immersed participants in active learning experiences that allowed them to learn more about the clinical skills and knowledge needed for practice. To create diverse and learner-centric experiences, the planning committee recruited current second- and third-year student pharmacists to serve as counselors and peer instructors for all camp activities. RESULTS: Over two years, the camp hosted 40 campers representing nine states. Campers were predominantly female (65.3%), an average age of 16.8 years, and 16% were from diverse backgrounds. Camper feedback found overall satisfaction with the camp was high, with most indicating they attended camp to learn more about the pharmacy profession, specifically the school. As of spring 2019, 20% of total campers had applied and been accepted into the HSOP's Early Assurance Program. CONCLUSIONS: While early findings are good, the true value of the camp will be found over time as the committee explores if more students are choosing pharmacy as a career.

Incorporation of a mock drug information telephone call exercise in a health-systems pharmacy laboratory.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hospital pharmacists routinely receive and answer drug information questions via telephone while performing order verification. This report describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a mock learning experience for student performance of these tasks in a health-systems pharmacy laboratory course. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: An active learning skills-based exercise involving students receiving and answering a standardized drug information question via telephone during an order verification activity, referred to as a cold-call exercise, was developed and implemented. Data collected included student grades on a baseline assessment, the cold call exercise, order verification exercises, and student perceptions from a voluntary post-exercise survey. Student performance on the cold-call exercise was further evaluated via individual sections of the cold-call rubric. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis of student opinion and an estimate of faculty time were also executed. FINDINGS: Student grades on the cold call and order verification exercises were 86.14% and 88.8%, respectively. Students often failed to ask category-specific questions because they did not categorize the ultimate question appropriately. Students found the activity organized and applicable. Time dedicated to creation was extensive, but execution and grading were reasonable. SUMMARY: Students performed well on the drug information exercise as well as the order verification component. Students and faculty enjoyed the experience, and students found the exercise relevant and challenging. This exercise could be implemented into any pharmacy curriculum in order to prepare students using authentic learning experiences.

Developing a comprehensive APPE-readiness plan with a focus on skills, attitudes, and behaviors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pharmacy schools must have a framework to ensure students have the necessary knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors to be successful during advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Ten summative assessments, called APPE-readiness assessments (ARAs), were developed based on eight competencies encompassing skills, behaviors, and attitudes that must be demonstrated prior to APPEs. All eight competencies were assessed in the course Case Studies in Pharmacotherapy IV, which is offered in the final semester of the didactic curriculum immediately prior to APPEs. A 15-question pre- and post-survey was conducted to assess student confidence in performing each APPE-readiness competency. Cohort data was evaluated by the curriculum and assessment committee to assess curriculum effectiveness and areas for improvement. FINDINGS: Upon completion of the course, the average first-attempt pass rate across all ARAs was 92.4%. All students who failed on the first attempt passed on the second attempt, thereby demonstrating APPE-readiness. Out of 62 students, 45 and 44 completed the pre- and post-survey, respectively. Prior to the ARAs, the overall average of students who felt (strongly) confident about their ability to perform each competency was 82.2 ± 2.1%. This increased to 92.6 ± 1.6% after the ARAs. SUMMARY: The development of an APPE-readiness assessment plan focusing on skills, attitudes, and behaviors provides insight into student and cohort performance and allows for continuous quality assurance of the pre-APPE curriculum.

Using a design-based research framework to refine a desirable difficulties activity for sterile compounding in a skills-based laboratory course.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Design-based research (DBR) processes aim to connect educational research with instructional techniques by focusing on the development and evaluation of multiple iterations of learning activities for systematic improvement within learning environments. Desirable difficulties (DD) are purposeful challenges introduced to facilitate deeper learning of material. The purpose of this work was to evaluate a second iteration of a sterile compounding DD study in the context of DBR in order to allow for the identification and refinement of the educational methods. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: In this second iteration, doctor of pharmacy students in their second professional year were exposed to both a mechanical and mathematical difficulty in sterile compounding training. Afterwards, students completed a questionnaire to rate their change in confidence and reflect on the activity. FINDINGS: An increase in confidence in sterile compounding skills was seen by the majority (97.9%) of students. Students' reflections highlighted gains in strategic knowledge, split between internal and external strategies. SUMMARY: Course instructors saw value in the refinement of a DD sterile compounding activity and plan to continue incorporating DBR processes in order to allow for the further improvement of this educational method. Faculty at other institutions could apply these processes to further refine a variety of educational activities.

Variation in training requirements within general surgery: comparison of 23 countries.

Background: Many differences exist in postgraduate surgical training programmes worldwide. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the training requirements in general surgery across 23 different countries. Methods: A collaborator affiliated with each country collected data from the country's official training body website, where possible. The information collected included: management, teaching, academic and operative competencies, mandatory courses, years of postgraduate training (inclusive of intern years), working-hours regulations, selection process into training and formal examination. Results: Countries included were Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, India, Ireland, Italy, Kuwait, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, USA and Zambia. Frameworks for defining the outcomes of surgical training have been defined nationally in some countries, with some similarities to those in the UK and Ireland. However, some training programmes remain heterogeneous with regional variation, including those in many European countries. Some countries outline minimum operative case requirement (range 60-1600), mandatory courses, or operative, academic or management competencies. The length of postgraduate training ranges from 4 to 10 years. The maximum hours worked per week ranges from 38 to 88 h, but with no limit in some countries. Conclusion: Countries have specific and often differing requirements of their medical profession. Equivalence in training is granted on political agreements, not healthcare need or competencies acquired during training.

Antecedentes: Existen muchas diferencias entre los programas de formación quirúrgica de posgrado del mundo. El objetivo de este estudio fue proporcionar una visión general de los requisitos formativos en cirugía general en 23 países diferentes. Métodos: En cada uno de los países participantes, un colaborador recopiló datos de la página web del organismo oficial encargado de la formación, si era posible. La información incluyó: gestión, formación, competencias académicas y operatorias, cursos obligatorios, años de formación de postgrado (que incluía el período de internado), regulaciones sobre las horas de trabajo, proceso de selección para la formación y existencia de un examen final. Resultados: Se incluyeron los datos de Australia, Bélgica, Canadá, Colombia, Dinamarca, Alemania, Grecia, Guatemala, India, Irlanda, Italia, Kuwait, Países Bajos, Nueva Zelanda, Rusia, Arabia Saudita, Sudáfrica, Corea del Sur, Suecia, Suiza, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos de América y Zambia. En algunos países existen los marcos normativos para definir los resultados del programa de formación, con ciertas semejanzas a los del Reino Unido e Irlanda. Sin embargo, algunos programas de formación, incluso en muchos países europeos, son muy heterogéneos con variaciones regionales. Pocos países describen el número mínimo de procedimientos quirúrgicos (rango 60 a 1.600), los cursos obligatorios o competencias quirúrgicas, académicos o de gestión exigidos. La duración de la formación postgraduada osciló de los 4 a los 10 años. El número de horas trabajadas máximas por semana oscilaron entre 38 y 88, sin límite en algunos países. Conclusión: Cada país tiene unos requisitos específicos, a menudo diferentes, para la formación de sus médicos. La convalidación se otorga por acuerdos políticos, más que por las necesidades médicas o por las competencias adquiridas durante la formación.

Nudging clinical supervisors to provide better in-training assessment reports.

INTRODUCTION: In-training assessment reports (ITARs) summarize assessment during a clinical placement to inform decision-making and provide formal feedback to learners. Faculty development is an effective but resource-intensive means of improving the quality of completed ITARs. We examined whether the quality of completed ITARs could be improved by 'nudges' from the format of ITAR forms. METHODS: Our first intervention consisted of placing the section for narrative comments at the beginning of the form, and using prompts for recommendations (Do more, Keep doing, Do less, Stop doing). In a second intervention, we provided a hyperlink to a detailed assessment rubric and shortened the checklist section. We analyzed a sample of 360 de-identified completed ITARs from six disciplines across the three academic years where the different versions of the ITAR were used. Two raters independently scored the ITARs using the Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating (CCERR) scale. We tested for differences between versions of the ITAR forms using a one-way ANOVA for the total CCERR score, and MANOVA for the nine CCERR item scores. RESULTS: Changes to the form structure (nudges) improved the quality of information generated as measured by the CCERR instrument, from a total score of 18.0/45 (SD 2.6) to 18.9/45 (SD 3.1) and 18.8/45 (SD 2.6), p = 0.04. Specifically, comments were more balanced, more detailed, and more actionable compared with the original ITAR. DISCUSSION: Nudge interventions, which are inexpensive and feasible, should be included in multipronged approaches to improve the quality of assessment reports.

Development and testing of an evidence-based model of mentoring nursing students in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Mentoring in clinical settings is an important factor in the development of nursing students' professional knowledge and competences, but more knowledge of mentors' current and required competences is needed to improve nursing students' clinical learning. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and test an evidence-based model of mentoring nursing students in clinical practice. DESIGN: An international cross-sectional survey coordinated in five European countries: Finland, Italy, Lithuania, Slovenia and Spain. METHODS: Mentors, 4980 registered nurses working in both primary and specialist healthcare organizations, were invited to participate in the study during 2016-2019. The final sample consisted of 1360 mentors (mean age 41.9 ± 11). Data were collected with background questions and the Mentor Competence Instrument. The instrument was psychometrically validated then the data were used to construct a Structural Equation Model (SEM) with Full Imputation Maximum Likelihood (FIML) estimation. RESULTS: All of six hypotheses were verified. In summary: mentors' characteristics related to their motivation and reflection are positively related to mentoring practices in the workplace, which (together with constructive feedback) are positively related to and foster goal-orientation in students' clinical learning and student-centered evaluation. All parameters in the SEM model were significant and the model's fit indexes were verified (RMSEA = 0.055; SRMR = 0.083; CFI = 0.914, TLI = 0.909). CONCLUSION: Our evidence-based modeling confirms the research hypotheses about mentorship, and identifies focal competences for designing mentors' education to improve students' clinical learning and establish a common European mentoring model. Mentorship is important for both healthcare organizations and educational systems to enhance students' clinical competences, professional growth and commitment to the nursing profession and organizational environments.